Paul Sellers sharpening system, which diamond stones? - Printable Version +- Woodnet Forums (https://forums.woodnet.net) +-- Thread: Paul Sellers sharpening system, which diamond stones? (/showthread.php?tid=7368758) |
RE: Paul Sellers sharpening system, which diamond stones? - Timberwolf - 06-21-2022 (06-21-2022, 11:25 AM)bandit571 Wrote: Rob ( Sancho) Cosman will tell you.... ........... RE: Paul Sellers sharpening system, which diamond stones? - CStan - 06-22-2022 (06-10-2022, 05:31 AM)Ricky Wrote: Okay, update. Ive been playing with the Seller method and now getting fairly consistent results. Because its fairly quick Ive added another step or two. After the 3 diamond plates I'm also giving the irons a few swipes on the round 3K (thanks Jack!). Here's a guy cutting some fairly intricate joints with what looks like a "convex" (rounded under) bevel a la Paul Sellers, et al. Like most things, it ends up being the Indian and not the arrow. Impulse hardened Japanese saw too -- $40 unit I guess. If that. Don't know about the chisel. Teknik Pengerjaan Kayu Jepang Keterampilan Tangan Tukang Kayu Sambung Kayu Elegan - YouTube RE: Paul Sellers sharpening system, which diamond stones? - C. in Indy - 06-22-2022 I used to have an instruction sheet from ECE Emmerich (German premium wood plane maker). They use fairly thick blades, and they had stated that a concave grind on the bevel wasn't preferred. I may not actually be speaking to the topic of the thread.... sorry! RE: Paul Sellers sharpening system, which diamond stones? - CStan - 06-22-2022 (06-22-2022, 07:09 AM)C. in Indy Wrote: I used to have an instruction sheet from ECE Emmerich (German premium wood plane maker). They use fairly thick blades, and they had stated that a concave grind on the bevel wasn't preferred. It's on point particularly when talking about Sellers since the method informs the media. His method is tough on oilstones as it's hard to do the procedure anywhere else other than the middle of the stone -- it's hard to work the margins, at least IMO it is. RE: Paul Sellers sharpening system, which diamond stones? - Timberwolf - 06-22-2022 (06-22-2022, 07:52 AM)CStan Wrote: It's on point particularly when talking about Sellers since the method informs the media. His method is tough on oilstones as it's hard to do the procedure anywhere else other than the middle of the stone -- it's hard to work the margins, at least IMO it is. .......... Here is part three of a video that shows how Bill Carter makes an oilstone box that allows one to utilize more of the hone's length, rather than just the center of it...I have seen boxes that were made like this... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UAdQ03seSE RE: Paul Sellers sharpening system, which diamond stones? - CStan - 06-22-2022 (06-22-2022, 10:32 AM)Timberwolf Wrote: .......... I have run-off blocks on my stones. Still not great with the Seller's bit. Something about it. If I was going to use that method on every chisel I had, I'd get diamond stones. RE: Paul Sellers sharpening system, which diamond stones? - AHill - 06-22-2022 (06-22-2022, 06:32 AM)CStan Wrote: Here's a guy cutting some fairly intricate joints with what looks like a "convex" (rounded under) bevel a la Paul Sellers, et al. Like most things, it ends up being the Indian and not the arrow. Impulse hardened Japanese saw too -- $40 unit I guess. If that. Don't know about the chisel. The part of the chisel doing the cutting looks pretty flat to me. RE: Paul Sellers sharpening system, which diamond stones? - Ricky - 06-22-2022 (06-22-2022, 07:09 AM)C. in Indy Wrote: I used to have an instruction sheet from ECE Emmerich (German premium wood plane maker). They use fairly thick blades, and they had stated that a concave grind on the bevel wasn't preferred. You're right on target since this style of sharpening does produce a convex grind. I'm getting the edge very sharp, including my ECE Primus smoother. RE: Paul Sellers sharpening system, which diamond stones? - adamcherubini - 06-23-2022 A little surprised by that Japanese woodworker. Sawing looked pretty sloppy. I think he didn’t attack the line like I would have, which resulted in a lot of paring, some of which also didn’t look that good. If you watch closely you can see that chisel submarining. He undercut a couple sharpie marks. This is why I tell people not to rely on bevel up paring. Totally agree with your (collective) points tho. The chisel looks flat or convex and the wood obviously doesn’t care. Doesn’t look ridiculously sharp tho, but totally acceptable. RE: Paul Sellers sharpening system, which diamond stones? - CStan - 06-24-2022 Here's another video of his: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dy8l6KH7Fns Maybe shows the chisel in profile a little better. Looks convex to me. |