Andyman
Witty Title Goes Here
Registered: 05/23/07
Posts: 3492
Loc: CNY,USA
|
|
And if so, does it make any meaningful difference in the planing process or the planed surface?
Interesting blog entry by Chris Schwarz
Curious to hear what some of y'all think...
Andy
Edit to add alternate title: "How many chips would a chipbreaker break if a chipbreaker could break chips?"
Edited by Andyman (01/01/08 12:07 PM)
|
Ted C
Member
Registered: 09/24/07
Posts: 217
Loc: Fredericton, NB Canada
|
|
Thanks for the link, Andy. That really got me thinking.
I've never paid a lot of attention to setting the chip breaker on my planes, usually just setting it by eye to what I think is a 'reasonably narrow' set-back. I usually find that fiddling with the depth and lateral adjustments will then give me what I consider acceptable performance, but I consider myself a beginner.
Chris Schwarz's opinion is one I've come to respect. Having seen this blog, maybe I should pay a little more attention and see if taking care to set a slightly different set-back will make a difference in how the plane performs.
I'd be interested in what some of the more learned members of the forum think.
Ted
|
EricU
Member
Registered: 05/28/05
Posts: 714
Loc: Central Pennsylvania
|
|
the actual purpose of the chipbreaker has always been somewhat of a puzzle to me. Since I've never really wrapped my head around how a plane works with a flat sole and the blade sticking down from that, as opposed to how a jointer works with its infeed table and outfeed table set at different heights.
|
MauleSkinner
Member
Registered: 12/31/06
Posts: 1331
Loc: Southern MN
|
|
Most definitely an amateur here as well, but a couple of things that I've noticed with cap irons is that they can be used to limit the depth of cut (I don't think the plane will cut any deeper than the chip iron is set above the edge of the iron), and Steve Knight doesn't put them on his planes. I recall Steve saying somewhere (but I can't find it now) that a tight mouth eliminates the need for a chipbreaker. Of course, his irons are 1/4" thick.
David
|
Shepherd
Member
Registered: 12/14/07
Posts: 85
Loc: Great Salt Lake City, Utah
|
|
Single blades with a tight mouth will produce a fine shaving.
Cap irons or chip breakers were made to use on planes that don't have tight mouths such as well used planes.
It breaks chips and helps reduce chatter.
"It is a poor craftsman that blames his tools." The problem most people have with cap irons is that they are not properly sharpened and improper position. These old tools takes some fetteling with and we should expect that.
Just take the time to get it tuned up and it will work just fine.
Stephen
|
kilo_watt
Amphibian Free Planing
Registered: 05/02/02
Posts: 3546
Loc: Frisco, TX
|
|
the chipbreaker definitely breaks chips. the function of the chipbreaker has been studied and documented by at least one university
-------------------- Un-funny Signatures are Signatures Too
|
lwilliams
Member
Registered: 04/15/06
Posts: 285
|
|
kilo_watt said:
the chipbreaker definitely breaks chips. the function of the chipbreaker has been studied and documented by at least one university
Chris' blog gives a link to the information I believe you're talking about. Maybe you should reread it?
Basically, all one needs to do is ask a few questions:
What do cap irons do?
How/why do they work?
Where are they an advantage?
Why were they introduced?
If you look at the answers to these questions, especially in a historical perspective, I think you'll find Chris' comments pretty mild.
|
rfeeser
Member
Registered: 05/28/04
Posts: 20881
Loc: Central NC
|
|
I didn't run out to the shop to do some new experimenting, but am just stating what I think. I have done experimenting now and then over the last few decades, but could be mistaken in my recollections. Who knows.
- I do not think chipbreakers break chips when smoothing or otherwise making very thin shavings. Very thin shavings are just too weak for that to be needed, or to work.
- I do think chipbreakers help by breaking chips when doing coarse work with a plane provided the chipbreaker is close enough to the cutting edge. I believe a well set chipbreaker can be a big help when wanting to take thick shavings. I've had cases where I was convinced that a plane could successfully cut thicker shavings with the chipbreaker down close to the edge than when it is pulled back farther than 1/64" or 1/32".
- I don't think the breaking function of chipbreakers is of any importance planing end grain or across the grain, again because the shavings are too weak to need to be broken to prevent them from pulling up fibers, causing tearout.
- Chipbreakers have to be fitted to the blade well. If thee is any hint of a gap or the transition from the blade to the top of the chipbreaker isn't smooth, the mouth will clog and all planing will stop. I don't consider that a problem with chipbreakers per se, just a need for careful tuning. However if all that tuning didn't improve the performance, why bother. I'm with Chris on that.
- I think when the chipbreaker is properly fitted to the blade, if the tight mouth or small setback of the chipbreaker causes clogging it's because the mouth is too tight. On many planes the solution is simply moving the frog back. But on many others the tightest part of the throat, the part where the clogging occurs isn't the mouth itself, but is a little bit higher where the top of the chipbreaker may close the throat tighter even than the mouth. There are two solutions to that that come to mind. One is filing the front of the throat of the plane so it isn't vertical but rather leans forward. I've seen 15 degrees suggested several places. But it depends on the curvature of the tip of the chipbreaker. The angle filed on the mouth has to be at least great enough so the throat doesn't close tighter than the mouth where the chipbreaker comes closest to the front of the throat. 15 degrees usually accomplishes that. One can also flatten out the curvature at the front of the chipbreaker, too, but I wouldn't do that unless it is obviously unusually steep.
- I think in all cases the chipbreaker helps to support the blade, and is especially important to thin blades. In this function it reduces chatter, not tearout. It works not only by adding mass to the blade but also by prestressing it. Both make it resist vibration better.
- Chris's comments about old wooden planes not having chipbreakers is true. But there also came a time when nearly all but the very cheapest one had them. The same kind of case could be made from that that they do work.
- For planes tuned to do fine work I agree with him that the added support for the blade is the only thing they accomplish.
It sounded to me like Chris was mostly complaining about poorly fitted chipbreakers, but maybe that's just because he didn't want to waste the space making that clearer.
Here's an example of how bad a poorly fit chipbreaker can be.
I was showing a group of people how to sharpen plane blades and how to adjust and use wooden planes. Everyone had brought in one of their own to work with.
One of the first fellows to finish sharpening his blade asked me to help him set the plane up. He already had the blade, chipbreaker, and wedge in, so it was just a matter of showing him how to make the blade project the right amount.
I showed him how to make the initial setting by laying the plane on a flat piece of wood, drop the blade in and set it flush against the wood under it, and tap the wedge in. As usual, when I took a couple of strokes down the edge of a piece of wood it cut fine. Everyone was happy and impressed that the wooden plane could be set so quickly.
But after several strokes it hit me that there weren't any shavings coming out the throat. Nor were there any down inside when I took a look. Not knowing what was going on, I pointed that out, and demonstrated by taking a few more strokes. There were some wide open eyes at that point.
About then I suspected what had to be happening. So I pulled the blade out and showed everyone that all those shavings were packed in between the blade and chipbeaker. Soon that plane would have jammed up and stopped working.
He'd forgotten to fit the chipbreaker tight to the blade, and actually had a pretty decent gap there.
-------------------- Cheers,
Bob
|
JimReed@Tallahassee
Orphaned Plane Doctor
Registered: 09/26/06
Posts: 4082
|
|
I am firmly in the camp of calling that sliver of steel a *blade stiffener*. Chipbreaker, my a**. If you are taking the proper thickness of shaving, it breaks itself. I can blow mine off the workbench with a single puff. Chipbreaker--HAR!
Stanley Bailey blades are a puny 1/16" thick. The *stiffener* doubles its thickness and also provides a slot for the Bailey adjuster. These thin, soft blades need stiffening to work properly. Without it, they flop back and forth like a piece of celery. All a bare Stanley blade would give you is a quick trip to CHATTERTOWN.
Use the quaint term chipbreaker if you wish. I know what that thing really does and it has nothing to do with breaking chips.
|
EricU
Member
Registered: 05/28/05
Posts: 714
Loc: Central Pennsylvania
|
|
JimReed@Tallahassee said:
I am firmly in the camp of calling that sliver of steel a *blade stiffener*.
I think that makes the most sense. If a chip is big enough to need to be broken, it's awful big. My LN scrub plane doesn't have a chip breaker, and obviously doesn't need it because the iron is so thick. I've had the experience of gumming up the works with a plane that had too much of a gap and a sharp blade. I probably have some planes that I haven't gotten around to tuning up that would have that problem if I used them.
|