Marv,
Good points as always. I won't disagree with you - I would give you a ribbing about the statement
"Making anything strictly for traditional reasons doesn't seem practical to me." coming from someone who likes restoring and sharpening hand saws and has a fetish with hand powered drills...
I mentioned stamping not so much for the end users of the backs, as I agree they won't likely be doing it - but more for Dom & Co. How far out is it to believe that someone selling all the various parts doesn't start also offering them fully assembled at some point? I'd be willing to wager if he is successful at this, there will (someday) be more to come.
Whether it's a more efficient design or not, I do tend to prefer the more "traditional" designs over modern, but I admit it's a personal choice. There well may be better ways of doing it - I think the Lee Valley back saws are probably the best deal out there for the money in the current crop of back saws available via retail, but not everyone has an injection molding machine (or what ever it is they use) handy to make their own, which is what this is really about. Besides - the "traditional" designs (however flawed they may be) have proven to be pretty reliable with some saws lasting (literally) centuries.
That all said, I enjoy seeing the basic design "furthered"... I think it's exciting, even though some may be John Deere green
. I might even try something similar myself someday. I still lust after some of Pedders' and Klaus' creations too, though God knows the last thing I need from any of this is yet another saw...
Leif